Related for Bava Kamma 133:11
א"כ ניכתוב רחמנא והשיב את גזילו אשר גזל למה לי למכתב ש"מ תרתי
[Now, does this not prove that Renunciation transfers ownership?]<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' For otherwise what right have they to consecrate or set aside the portions for the priest and Levite? ');"><sup>20</sup></span> — It may be said that in that case there was also a change in name, as previously it was called <i>tebel</i><span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e., produce from which the priest's and Levite's portion has not been set aside. ');"><sup>21</sup></span>
Tosefta Terumot
The thief, and the robber, and one who forces [people to sell things against their will]: their terumah is [valid] terumah, and their tithes are [valid] tithes, and their consecrated produce is [valid] consecrated produce. [But] if the landowners were chasing after them [to reclaim the stolen produce], their terumah is not [valid] terumah, and their tithes are not [valid] tithes, and their consecrated produce is not [valid] consecrated produce. Landowners [whose land was purchased from] sicarii [assassins who ransomed property by threatening the life of the previous owner, see Y. Git. V.7.2)]: their terumah is [valid] terumah, and their tithes are [valid] tithes, and their consecrated produce is [valid] consecrated produce.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy